IRAQ: Diplomacy Not Troops
Many of you probably heard the President outline his plan for a continued U.S. military presence in Iraq - specifically his proposal for an increase in U.S. troops in Iraq. Radio reports this morning noted that the majority of Americans polled disagree with the President%26#039;s strategy. The Center of Concern shares many of these concerns and maintains that a military solution to the crisis in Iraq is not feasible, nor desireable.
Below is a statement issued by concerned Catholic organizations in the U.S., including the Center of Concern, condemning the President%26#039;s strategy in Iraq and calling for an alternative policy of diplomacy and development. We invite you to read the statement and your thoughts on U.S. engagement in Iraq.
RESPONSE TO THE PRESIDENT%26#039;S PROPOSAL FOR A CHANGE OF COURSE IN IRAQ
January, 2007
On January 10, 2007, President Bush announced a change in Iraq policy. We, as organizations of Catholics and as individuals, come together to respond to these new Iraq initiatives.
We respond in the context of Jesus%26#039; call to us in the beatitudes to be people of peace (Matt 5:9), and to love our enemies (Luke 6:27) as well as the November 2006 statement by the President of United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, Bishop William S. Skylstad. In that statement, Bishop Skylstad notes that the pain and destruction of the war in Iraq is %26quot;measured in lives lost and many more injured, in widespread sectarian strife, civil insurgency and terrorist attacks, and in the daily struggles of Iraqis to build a decent future for their devastated nation.%26quot; He noted further that the way forward is bleak and stated that %26quot;The Holy See and our Conference now support broad and necessary international engagement to promote stability and reconstruction in Iraq.%26quot;
We are keenly aware that the members of the U.S. military and their families are shouldering the heavy burdens of extended service in Iraq. They risk death and injury of both body and spirit. However, it is crucial to recognize that political and economic concerns, not military issues, are fueling the continuing strife. Therefore, only solutions that combine the political, diplomatic, economic and religious issues Iraqis face will effectively resolve the underlying conflict and bring peace to Iraq. As the last three years have demonstrated, increasing the U.S. troop presence in Iraq will neither address the root causes of civil strife nor quell the violence. Increased U.S. military action will needlessly endanger our troops and detract from effective action to achieve a cease-fire and create peace. Therefore, the escalation of military presence in Iraq is detrimental to our men and women in the armed forces.
The escalation of military action is far more harmful to Iraqi citizens who are paying the ultimate price in ever-increasing numbers through violence, hunger and lack of ordinary services. Every day, more and more ordinary Iraqis are fleeing their homes and becoming refugees - either within Iraq or in neighboring countries. This dislocation spreads religious, economic and political instability around the region, making it increasingly difficult to handle the influx of those traumatized by this war. The escalation of military action is detrimental to the Iraqi people and the surrounding region.
United States citizens are keenly aware that the military is not an effective tool for bringing peace to Iraq. U.S. citizens understand that Iraq is in the midst of a civil war that requires the engagement of all parties in a peace process in order to resolve the issues. Military action in this context only brings more violence and bloodshed and no end to this conflict. The escalation of military action is detrimental the desires of people of the United States.
Finally, only those in the military and their families are sacrificing for the sake of this war. There has been no effort to finance this war with taxes or other military offsets and the war has been funded without consideration of its impact on the overall federal budget. This fiscal irresponsibility will hamper future generations as they are forced to pay the bills for this generation%26#039;s war. The escalation of military action is detrimental to the economic future of the United States.
THEREFORE:
We oppose the proposed escalation of U.S. troops in Iraq noting that prior escalations have not resulted in increased peace and stability. Troop escalations in Baghdad in the late summer and early fall of 2006 resulted in increased violence and death for both U.S. soldiers and Iraqi civilians.
We support the President%26#039;s call for economic development in Iraq, noting that the current unemployment rate is running at 40 to 50%. Additionally, 60% of the population is under the age of 25 and is in dire need of alternatives to imagine a better future. Any economic development should directly benefit the Iraqi people and their communities, not contractors from other corners of the world.
We urge the President to engage in diplomatic and political negotiations seeking a comprehensive cease fire by all factions in Iraq and the region. The rejection of a comprehensive diplomatic effort is a short-sighted view of American interests. A surge of diplomacy, not an escalation of troops is what is required.
SIMONE CAMPBELL, SSS, Executive Director
NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby
CAROLE SHINNICK, SSND, Executive Director
Leadership Conference of Women Religious
T. MICHAEL McNULTY, SJ, Justice and Peace Director
Conference of Major Superiors of Men
ALEXIA KELLEY, Executive Director
Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good
DAVID A. ROBINSON, Executive Director
Pax Christi USA.
JIM HUG, SJ, President
Center of Concern
MARIE DENNIS, Director
Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns
JOE MOLONEY, OSF, President
Franciscan Federation of the United States
AMY WOOLAM ECHEVERRIA
Columban JPIC Office
JANET GOTTSCHALK, MMS, Director
Medical Mission Sisters%26#039; Alliance for Justice
FRANK McNEIRNEY, National Coordinator
Catholics Against Capital Punishment (CACP)
SEAMUS FINN, OMI, Director,
Missionary Oblates of Mary Immaculate
Justice, Peace %26amp; Integrity of Creation Office
What%26#039;s the official position of Catholic Church on Iraq War?
lot for me to read. so I am answering the meat of the question, and that would be, no, the Catholic Church did not have an official position but the members each had their own, I am all for more troops in Iraq, I don%26#039;t know about others. You cannot negotiate with terrorists, they have already said, %26quot;convert or die!%26quot;........that says it all for me.
%26quot;Whoever wishes for peace, let him prepare for war.%26quot;, Vegetius.
%26quot;War is the continuation of politics by other means.%26quot;, Karl Von Clausewitz.
What%26#039;s the official position of Catholic Church on Iraq War?
loan
The Pope calls War a Defeat for Humanity: Neoconservative Iraq Just War Theories Rejected|||They don%26#039;t have an %26quot;official%26quot; position. There%26#039;s priests who pray over weapons of war as well as blessing the men who go over to Iraq to %26quot;kill the enemy%26quot;.
According to the Bible that they supposedly preach on and the God they supposedly serve, the official position they should be holding, as well as all of Christendom, is shown by Jehovah(the Catholics use Yahweh which is a translation of Jehovah, God%26#039;s true name) God himself at Exodus 20:13;%26quot;Do not commit murder.%26quot;|||Remember the separation of Church and State?. The Church do not have the right to involve on government policies. The Church is always against any form of war or violence. But it is the government who makes the decisions, not the Church.|||Pastor Billy says: roadwarrior need a lesson in history. The ideal of separation of Church and State was for the protection of Church not State. Now on to the Catholic Church position... it is one which declares the war an unjust action. All American Catholics should be lead by their conscience to not participate.
No comments:
Post a Comment